Welcome New Members! Stop by here to say hello or dive into any topic!

05/17/17 - EVERY TIME I TRY TO BE MAD AT TRUMP, THE MEDIA PULL ME BACK

Ann Coulter's Weekly Column
Now open for public comments.
All Opinions welcome but please keep it clean and respectful.
If you want to enjoy more of what the ACOC forum has to offer, please register.
Message
Author
kermit
Forum Moderator
Posts: 10356
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:28 am

05/17/17 - EVERY TIME I TRY TO BE MAD AT TRUMP, THE MEDIA PULL ME BACK

#1

#1 Post by kermit » Wed May 17, 2017 4:55 pm

Ann Coulter wrote:EVERY TIME I TRY TO BE MAD AT TRUMP, THE MEDIA PULL ME BACK

May 17, 2017


Every time I try to be mad at Trump, the media reel me back in by launching some ridiculous, unprovoked attack. This time, it's the fake news story about Trump "leaking" classified information to the Russkies.

The president can't "leak" classified information: It's his to declassify.

The big secret Trump allegedly revealed is that Muslims might try to blow up a plane with laptops. I already knew that. I read it in The New York Times.

The New York Times, March 22, 2017:

Devices Banned on Some Planes Over ISIS Fears

"Intelligence showing that the Islamic State is developing a bomb hidden in portable electronics spurred the United States and Britain on Tuesday to bar passengers from airports in a total of 10 Muslim-majority countries from carrying laptop computers ... two senior American counterterrorism officials said. ..."

This totally secret, Deep Throat-level information has been widely published in thousands of news outlets throughout the civilized world. There was yet another round of stories last week with the update that the U.S. is considering a laptop ban on flights from Europe as well.

Hey, you know what might make more sense than banning laptops? How about banning Muslims?

Bear with me here, I'm still working out the details, but I'm almost certain a federal judge in Hawaii can't block a president's temporary ban on Muslim immigration just because he's testy with Trump over some campaign statements.

As Northwestern law professor Eugene Kontorovich explained in The Washington Post, courts have never examined a politician's campaign statements for improper motive, because 1) campaigns are not part of the deliberative process; and 2) to start doing so would open the door to "examinations of the entire lives of political officials whose motives may be relevant to legal questions."

Nonetheless, Kontorovich says, that is the legal argument being advanced against Trump's travel ban: "Trump is a bigot, and thus his winning presidential campaign in fact impeaches him from exercising key constitutional and statutory powers, such as administering the immigration laws."

To preserve their judicial coup, this Monday, the 9th Circuit sent out the geriatric ward to hear an appeal of the Hawaii judge's absurd ruling. At their ages, there's a good chance the judges will be dead by the time the Supreme Court overturns them.

Arguing against Trump's exercise of his constitutional and statutory powers was first-generation American, Neal Katyal. (There are plenty of 10th-generation America-haters. You couldn't get one of them to argue that we should end our country through mass immigration?)

At oral argument before the three wheezing gargoyles, Katyal announced that, before enforcing federal immigration laws passed by generations of Democrats and Republicans working together in Congress, the president of the United States is required to profess: "Islam is peace."

There's a new legal principle!

Asked by one of the crypt-keepers if Trump is the only president who would be prohibited from issuing this precise travel ban because of his statements about Muslims, the smarmy, preening, pretentious Katyal answered: "I think the most important point is, if you don't say all these things, you never wind up with an executive order like this."

As lawyers say: Nonresponsive!

But as long as we're operating under these new rules for determining a U.S. president's rights and responsibilities, how about looking at everything Trump has said about Muslims?

For example, may the courts consider this quote from September 2015?

Trump: "I love the Muslims. I think they are great people. ... Would I consider putting a Muslim-American in my Cabinet? Oh, absolutely. No problem with that."

Lawyers like Katyal aren't telling the courts what Trump said; they're telling courts their own crazy interpretations of what Trump said. No liberal is capable of accurately reporting Trump's position because the left never understood his position in the first place. As Peter Thiel said, the media take Trump literally, but not seriously, while the people take him seriously, but not literally.

After the San Bernardino terrorist attacks in December 2015, Trump made the perfectly reasonable suggestion that we curtail our breakneck importation of Muslims, some of whom periodically erupt in murderous violence. The media concluded: TRUMP HATES MUSLIMS! Nothing Trump or anyone else said could persuade them otherwise.

Here's what Trump actually said:

"What's happened is, we're out of control. We have no idea who's coming into our country. We have no idea if they love us or if they hate us. ... I have friends that are Muslims. They are great people. But they know we have a problem. They know we have a real problem. 'Cause something is going on. And we can't put up with it, folks. ...

"Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on. ... Where the hatred comes from and why -- we'll have to determine, we're going to have to figure it out. We have to figure it out. We can't live like this. It's going to get worse and worse. You're going to have more World Trade Centers. ..."

Throughout the campaign, Trump supporters tried in vain to explain the so-called "Muslim ban" to a hostile media dead set on interpreting everything out of Trump's mouth in the ugliest possible way. For example, our general policy on Muslim immigration would be "No, thanks!" but there would be exceptions. So Charles Krauthammer can stop worrying about King Abdullah of Jordan.

In March, Trump supporter Andy Dean told a dense CNN anchor:

"He's talking about the culture of Islam in the Middle East. ... We love Muslims in America and they love us. Why? We have a great culture that respects women's rights. ... The thing about Muslims in the Middle East is they don't respect women's rights. If a woman wants to get a divorce in the Middle East, that woman could be killed. If you want to leave the religion of Islam in the Middle East, you can be killed. It's very real."

To the same blockhead anchor, Trump supporter Kayleigh McEnany had to fill in an edited quote the network had just shown of Trump:

"It's important to know what happened 15 seconds later. Anderson Cooper said to him, 'Are you speaking of radical Islam or are you speaking of Islam?' He said radical; sometimes it's hard to tell the difference, though. So he did say radical Islam. He said it repeatedly during his campaign. He said, 'I have Muslim friends. I love the Muslim people.' ..."

One of Trump's vast number of African-American supporters told HLN's Drew Pinksy:

"I love what (Trump) is doing with the Muslims getting out of the country, because if they really knew what that was about -- if they knew that that was about freedom. It was about freedom versus enslavement."

He's right. It's not about religion. It's not about nationality. It's about hitting the pause button on bringing in radical Islam's dysfunctional, misogynist, violent, exploding-airplane culture.

The voters understood Trump. (At least some of us did -- barely enough of us to elect him president!) Liberals didn't. But now the courts are blocking Trump's exercise of presidential powers based on the left's own idiotic misinterpretations of what he said.

COPYRIGHT 2017 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION
1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106; 816-581-7500

User avatar
Stephen50right
Posts: 1461
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: 05/17/17 - EVERY TIME I TRY TO BE MAD AT TRUMP, THE MEDIA PULL ME BACK

#2

#2 Post by Stephen50right » Wed May 17, 2017 5:08 pm

Our side getting mad at Trump is a waste of time and energy. We all know that a number of things Trump stated in his campaign as far as time frames were metaphors. That being said, Trump is still on track to get everything accomplished that he promised.

Trump is doing a tremendous job under tough circumstances. Remember, we didn't elect a king, we elected a president, so the procedures of getting many things done in our republic are never immediate. Besides, patience is a virtue anyway.

With patience, determination, and hard work, we shall achieve virtually everything, if not everything we set out to do when we elected Donald Trump.

Nabi Rasch
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 5:02 pm

Re: 05/17/17 - EVERY TIME I TRY TO BE MAD AT TRUMP, THE MEDIA PULL ME BACK

#3

#3 Post by Nabi Rasch » Wed May 17, 2017 11:31 pm

Even reading Ann's column--how she feels she has to sugar coat Trump's statements and intentions-it's apparent that the truth has become perhaps fatally toxic. Darkly comical.

User avatar
syzygy
Posts: 10951
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:30 am
Location: Still on my tractor O=o

Re: 05/17/17 - EVERY TIME I TRY TO BE MAD AT TRUMP, THE MEDIA PULL ME BACK

#4

#4 Post by syzygy » Thu May 18, 2017 1:27 am

Stephen50right wrote:
Wed May 17, 2017 5:08 pm
Our side getting mad at Trump is a waste of time and energy. We all know that a number of things Trump stated in his campaign as far as time frames were metaphors. That being said, Trump is still on track to get everything accomplished that he promised.

Trump is doing a tremendous job under tough circumstances. Remember, we didn't elect a king, we elected a president, so the procedures of getting many things done in our republic are never immediate. Besides, patience is a virtue anyway.

With patience, determination, and hard work, we shall achieve virtually everything, if not everything we set out to do when we elected Donald Trump.
:clap:

Well said. Even Ann is coming BACK around to our way of thinking. :lol:

User avatar
syzygy
Posts: 10951
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:30 am
Location: Still on my tractor O=o

Re: 05/17/17 - EVERY TIME I TRY TO BE MAD AT TRUMP, THE MEDIA PULL ME BACK

#5

#5 Post by syzygy » Thu May 18, 2017 1:36 am

Nabi Rasch wrote:
Wed May 17, 2017 11:31 pm
Even reading Ann's column--how she feels she has to sugar coat Trump's statements and intentions-it's apparent that the truth has become perhaps fatally toxic. Darkly comical.
If you've got something to say, up and say it. We have enough pseudo-intellectual, erudite philosopher wanna-be's here, already.

Personally, I'm sick of your vague, nebulous horsesh!t. Speak up, clearly and concisely, or STFU.

VermontSurvivor
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 10:37 am

Re: 05/17/17 - EVERY TIME I TRY TO BE MAD AT TRUMP, THE MEDIA PULL ME BACK

#6

#6 Post by VermontSurvivor » Thu May 18, 2017 9:57 am

By using a special prosecutor or third party investigation team instead of say, the senate intelligence committee, are we undermining the trust of our systems already in place?

User avatar
syzygy
Posts: 10951
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:30 am
Location: Still on my tractor O=o

Re: 05/17/17 - EVERY TIME I TRY TO BE MAD AT TRUMP, THE MEDIA PULL ME BACK

#7

#7 Post by syzygy » Fri May 19, 2017 8:10 pm

VermontSurvivor wrote:
Thu May 18, 2017 9:57 am
By using a special prosecutor or third party investigation team instead of say, the senate intelligence committee, are we undermining the trust of our systems already in place?
Your question raises a good point, but not quite the one I think you're trying to make. Trust in any of our institutions--House, Senate, intel community, law enforcement (FBI, DOJ)-- has already been eroded to the point of virtual non-existence. In my opinion, I think a lot of that is a result of the Obama years. He politicized every government agency and department, including the FBI and DOJ.

The Democrats were in lockstep behind him on every piece of legislation or executive fiat, no matter how corrupt, unconstitutional, or bad it was (see Obamacare).

In this particular instance, the lack of trust of our systems isn't being displayed by the people, but rather by the various systems themselves and that in one another.

The FBI started this investigation of Russians almost a year ago. Because of leaks of juicy bits resulting from the investigation, all for political reasons--to hurt Trump--the House started its own investigation, lacking trust in the FBI, apparently. Nunes, the R leader of the House investigation, was made privy to some info by the White House, and so the Dems cried foul, and said they no longer trusted the House investigation to be legit.

Further on, Comey gets fired, and a supposed colleague leaks part of a Comey memo, over the phone, to the WaPo, a memo which supposedly said that Trump supposedly said to Comey he hoped he could drop any further investigation of Flynn, or some such.

See what I mean? The Congress doesn't trust the FBI, the FBI doesn't trust them either, Comey refusing to release any details to them during questioning, the Dems don't trust the Reps, and vice-versa, Trump doesn't trust Comey, and vice-versa, and on and on.

Can't say as I blame any of them. I wouldn't trust the lot of 'em, myself, w/e of Trump. So far, he's done, or tried to do, EVERYTHING he promised in his campaign. That trust has been earned, btw. I didn't trust him for squat when he started his campaign. Total 180, now.

mrright
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:59 pm

Re: 05/17/17 - EVERY TIME I TRY TO BE MAD AT TRUMP, THE MEDIA PULL ME BACK

#8

#8 Post by mrright » Mon May 22, 2017 10:33 pm

It is clear now that he white house is a fish bowl. Unless they can get Maxwell Smart's "Cone of silence" nothing important should ever be discussed there. It is likely that Obama had the place bugged, and now his stooges try to say he leaks come from white house staff. This is the deep state at its most diabolical. Re sweep the place using new people find the buge then put Obama behind bars for it. Then sweep the intelligence apparatus. They are better at spying on Mr. Trump than any of our enemies.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest